Quote from: gitano;138321PS - I forgot another political "wrinkle". ALL personnel that enter the federal military, regardless of branch or whether drafted (not any more), or volunteer, have a SIX YEAR COMMITMENT. MOST "Army" soldiers serve two years of active duty the four years as a "reservist". Navy personnel spend at least FOUR years on active duty and then have two more years as a "reservist". People that are 'rotated' out of active duty can CHOOSE to do their "reserve time" in the NG. This is how the federal government justifies "giving" money to states for their NG. Here's something that should muddy the waters: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Guard_Bureau
Paul
I can't speak for the other services, but the Army has an 8 year Mandatory Service Obligation (MSO) currently. If you sign your name today, you commit to 8 years. Though we have had 2+4 options in the past, we dont now. That is 2 years Active, 4 years Reserve and then 2 more years Inactive Reserve(IRR). IRR do not drill or receive any benefits. The most common term of enlistment these days is 4 years active then 4 years inactive reserve with a fair amount of 6 Active and then only 2 IRR as well, really depends on what options you take and what specialty you go into (read how much training you are going to get). I would say that most Soldiers who choose to do only their initial term of enlistment, do not commit to Active Reserves or National Guard afterwards. My brother is Active Guard, been that for years after doing 4 years Regular Army, and has spent 2 years deployed to war zones while Guard and 6 months while Regular Army, I would dare say he would be extremely insulted by your opinions. He may be the exception to many in the Guard, but regardless they sign up to do something that about 99% of the general population won't think twice about and many of which couldn't if they did want to. And yes, he considers himself first and formost an employee of the State, which is just as it should be.