The Hunter's Life Forums

GENERAL INTEREST FORUMS => POST A POLL => Topic started by: RatherBHuntin on October 31, 2013, 05:02:43 PM

Poll
Question: Redfield Revenge or Nikon ProStaff
Option 1: edfield Revenge votes: 0
Option 2: ikon ProStaff votes: 3
Title: Redfield Revenge vs Nikon ProStaff
Post by: RatherBHuntin on October 31, 2013, 05:02:43 PM
Need to replace the Nikon Monarch I stole from my son's 308 and have narrowed the choices to Refield Revenge 3-9x42 or the Nikon ProStaff 3-9x40. The Redfield is about $30 cheaper. I really like the Nikon I have, but sure the ProStaff will not be as good as the Monarch though.
Thoughts?
Title: Re: Redfield Revenge vs Nikon ProStaff
Post by: davidlt89 on November 01, 2013, 03:10:59 AM
Well Glenn, I actually have some input! Now, I have never used a redfield revenge but I do have two prostaffs. I decided to try them when I got my 25-06, I just did not want to break the bank with a new scope so I ordered a prostaff. I used that rifle that year to hunt deer and I will say that I was very dissapointed in low light with it. It certainly was not as good as my VX-III on the 7mm mag. That being said, i decided to order another one for my 45/70 when I first put a scope on it. Nikon had just changed the design of the prostaff and built it a little differently. I then decided to put a peep sight on the 45/70 and sold the old prostaff on the 25-06 and put the "improved" prostaff on it.
I took that rifle to my bear stand this year. When it was a few minutes past shooting time I could not see my bait barrel at 10 yards so I decided to look through the scope. I could see the opening of the barrel and under the barrel, I was very impressed with the "upgrades" they made to the scope. I would definitely recommend this scope if you don't want to break the bank. I must say though, it does not compare to the buckmasters, but you did not ask about that! I can get buckmasters pretty cheap:D
Title: Re: Redfield Revenge vs Nikon ProStaff
Post by: gitano on November 01, 2013, 07:25:40 AM
I don't know enough - anything - about either, to make a choice. I am NOT "the glass guy". The only reason I posted this comment was to let you know that you weren't yelling into 'the abyss'.
 
Paul
Title: Re: Redfield Revenge vs Nikon ProStaff
Post by: j0e_bl0ggs (deceased) on November 01, 2013, 08:02:26 AM
cough 'abstain' cough!
Title: Re: Redfield Revenge vs Nikon ProStaff
Post by: RatherBHuntin on November 01, 2013, 10:48:54 AM
David,
PM me a quote on a 3-9x40 Nikon Buckmaster.  That is what I really wanted, just didn't want to pay that much for a scope that won't get an awful lot of use.
Title: Re: Redfield Revenge vs Nikon ProStaff
Post by: davidlt89 on March 01, 2015, 03:57:06 PM
the ruger American Rifle I just purchased came with a redfield revolution!!!! It is better than the prostaff!!! Nice piece of glass in my opinion!! will know more when the snow melts!!! God Bless.
Title: Re: Redfield Revenge vs Nikon ProStaff
Post by: RatherBHuntin on March 02, 2015, 03:56:43 PM
Thanks David.  I put a Prostaff on my son's 308, but still have one Savage .243 that needs a scope at some point (to replace the Simmons junk  that came on it).  May go with the Revelution on it when I get around to it..no hurry here though.
Title: Re: Redfield Revenge vs Nikon ProStaff
Post by: sakorick on May 20, 2015, 02:43:32 PM
A German professional hunter, Helmut,  once told me......Rick you show me a $2000 Steyr mit a cheap scope and you show me a piece of dung. You show me a cheap Remington 700 mit a Zeiss, and I smile.

That said I have grown fond of the Nikon Pro Staff and have one on my new Sako. Good Luck, Rick.