Recent posts

#41
Parker Hale/BSA Rifles / Re: A tired old BSA CF2 .222
Last post by branxhunter - March 28, 2024, 08:49:30 PM
So rebarrelling would be the only way to resurrect the old girl, but was it worth spending money on? I asked if he had any take off barrels that might suit. 

The key constraint is the shank diameter on these BSAs - at 1.235" outer diameter, 1.115" outer thread diameter there are not many candidates. 

After some head scratching and searching he did manage to dredge up an ex-F-class .224 cal barrel on a SMLE No.4 action which had enough meat and length. For the princely sum of $100 fitted it was too good an opportunity to pass up.

It took a few weeks for the work to get done, primarily because I hadn't taken the bolt down with the barrelled action. In the meantime I stripped the stock.

#42
Parker Hale/BSA Rifles / Re: A tired old BSA CF2 .222
Last post by branxhunter - March 28, 2024, 04:54:00 PM
The crown looked a bit sad so took the barrelled action down to a clever fella to get an inch or so lopped off the end.

He took a look through it with the borescope and it was a waste of time, the barrel was completely stuffed.

Later he sectioned the barrel which tended to confirm his diagnosis
#43
Parker Hale/BSA Rifles / Re: A tired old BSA CF2 .222
Last post by branxhunter - March 28, 2024, 04:50:21 PM
I haven't played with one of these before.

The bore was pretty ragged. Brad can't remember ever cleaning it, and apparently his dad wasn't big on gun maintenance. We ran quite a few patches through it a got some beautiful blue patches.

Shot some groups which were terrible.

Marcus
#44
Parker Hale/BSA Rifles / A tired old BSA CF2 .222
Last post by branxhunter - March 28, 2024, 04:46:46 PM
My friend Brad inherited his dad's BSA .222 when his dad died 5 years ago. He's been using it for foxes and four legged crop raiders under the spotlight but results have been inconsistent. 

I suggested that unless completely shot out .222s are usually accurate enough for his intended use so something is probably amiss. I said bring it around and I'll have a look.

Sooooo....... it's an CF2, and is a typical cockies rifle that hasn't been coddled.



#45
FIREARMS & OPTICS / Re: A couple of unique Brnos -...
Last post by branxhunter - March 28, 2024, 02:26:48 PM
Yeah the Guns and Game magazine was the best of the bunch, but sadly no longer published. Always had some good practical no frills articles.

Marcus
#46
THE CAMPFIRE / Luck o' the Irish
Last post by Jamie.270 - March 17, 2024, 03:14:45 PM
The Corned Beef is in the pot, and my Irish blood (what there is of it) is a singin' on this fine almost spring day.

Doing anything special on this day o' the green?
#47
FIREARMS & OPTICS / Re: j0e_bl0ggs guns
Last post by branxhunter - March 13, 2024, 11:18:24 PM
Quote from: gitano on January 15, 2024, 02:06:32 PMI wondered about that too, Marcus. I haven't come up with an answer. He liked the .17 Rem, and one of them shot "little bug-holes". (I don't remember which one.  :( )  I haven' shot either of them yet. I do remember that his favorite load 1) used Vihtavouri powder, and 2) MV was under 4000 f/s. Maybe under 3800. I'm not too interested in a .17 bullet doing less than 4000, because 1) I know it's easy to get them going faster, and 2) if I have a 40-grain .22 bullet going 4000+ (from the .22-250), I don't really care about a 25-grain, .17 caliber bullet doing 3700. The .17 Remington that I have had from the early '80s has an average MV of 4112 with a 25-grain Hornady. It doesn't shoot as precisely as is reported on line for most .17 Rems - "only" 1-MoA at 100. (There's an interesting story associated with that.)

I'll shoot Alain's and see what I want to do with them after that. I do have two grandsons...

Paul

Sounds like a good plan. My daughter loves the Sako .17-222 and has basically claimed it as hers.

Marcus
#48
FIREARMS & OPTICS / Re: j0e_bl0ggs guns
Last post by gitano - January 15, 2024, 02:06:32 PM
I wondered about that too, Marcus. I haven't come up with an answer. He liked the .17 Rem, and one of them shot "little bug-holes". (I don't remember which one.  :( )  I haven' shot either of them yet. I do remember that his favorite load 1) used Vihtavouri powder, and 2) MV was under 4000 f/s. Maybe under 3800. I'm not too interested in a .17 bullet doing less than 4000, because 1) I know it's easy to get them going faster, and 2) if I have a 40-grain .22 bullet going 4000+ (from the .22-250), I don't really care about a 25-grain, .17 caliber bullet doing 3700. The .17 Remington that I have had from the early '80s has an average MV of 4112 with a 25-grain Hornady. It doesn't shoot as precisely as is reported on line for most .17 Rems - "only" 1-MoA at 100. (There's an interesting story associated with that.)

I'll shoot Alain's and see what I want to do with them after that. I do have two grandsons...

Paul
#49
FIREARMS & OPTICS / Re: A couple of unique Brnos -...
Last post by gitano - January 15, 2024, 01:44:26 PM
Missed the articles.

Excellent reads!

Paul
#50
Quotable Quotes / Re: Your own favourite quotes ...
Last post by branxhunter - January 15, 2024, 11:51:03 AM
A former work colleague of mine from over 25 years ago:

" That's the trouble with getting your ambitions mixed up with your capabilities" Dennis Holmes

Marcus